The UN today just circulated this letter sent by Israel to the UN Human Rights Council president, confirming Jerusalem’s intention to negotiate the issues surrounding its possible return to the troubled body.
The council can show good faith by removing its notorious agenda item on Israel, the only provision of its kind that requires a special and separate focus on a particular country at every meeting. Not even gross abusers like China, Sudan, or Syria, nor any other country in the world, is subjected to this kind of treatment.
Under that item, in its last session in March, the council adopted six resolutions condemning Israel — while it adopted only four resolutions condeming other countries around the world, one each on Syria, Iran, Myanmar and Sri Lanka. The plight of the vast majority of the world’s victims of gross and systematic violations—from China to Saudi Arabia, Cuba to Zimbabwe—failed to merit a single resolution.
Israel is the only UN member state excluded from the regional group system at the council. The UN must end this violation of basic equality and due process. EU states should enable Israel to join the council’s Western group, to which it was admitted at the UN in New York over a decade ago.
Moreover, the council’s permanent investigator on Israeli violations is mandated by the council to examine only Israel and not Hamas, Fatah, Islamic Jihad, or any other Palestinian actor. It’s the only country mandate that examines the actions of only one side, and presumes them to be violations.
The one they chose for the job, Richard Falk, endorses Hamas, praises 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and was just condemned two weeks ago by UN chief Ban Ki-moon, the US, the UK, and Canada for implying the Boston attacks were somehow the fault of the U.S. and Israel.
The United Nations must stop violating its own charter guarantee to respect the equal rights of nations large and small, and the Human Rights Council must respect its own principles of universality, impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity.
Quotes and Key Facts on UNHRC Treatment of Israel
Regional Group Exclusion
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 25 March 1998, said that “Israel [is] the only Member State that is not a member of one of the regional groups…This anomaly should be corrected. We must uphold the principle of equality among all United Nations Member States.”
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 12 December 1999 remarked that “the exclusion of Israel from the system of regional groupings [and] the intense focus given to some of Israel’s actions, while other situations sometimes fail to elicit the similar outrage […] have given a regrettable impression of bias and one-sidedness.”
• Kofi Annan, in regard to Israel’s exclusion from a regional group, said that “we must uphold the principle of equality among Member States. I shall keep encouraging all concerned to find a solution.”
• Late UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Sergio de Mello actively lobbied Ambassadors in Geneva for the inclusion of Israel into the Western group.
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 15 March 2005 spoke of the “need to correct a long-standing anomaly that kep tIsrael from participating fully and equally in the work of the Organization” by including Israel as member of the Western European and Others Group in Geneva.
• Sir Robert Jennings, QC, former President of the International Court of Justice, wrote that “Israel’s exclusion from the regional group system places the UN in breach of its fundamental obligations regarding sovereign equality and is thus illegal… The need now to redress it is urgent.”
Biased Agenda Item and Resolutions
• UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on 20 June 2007 criticized “the Council’s decision to single out only one specific regional item given the range of human rights violations throughout the entire world,” referring to item 7 on the Council’s agenda.
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 25 March 1998 said that “I know that Israelis see hypocrisy and double standards in the intense scrutiny given to some of its actions, while other situations fail to elicit the world’s outrage and condemnations.”
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, in his message to the Human Rights Council on 29 November 2006, expressed the hope that the Council would deal with the Middle East issue “in an impartial way” and “not allow it to monopolize attention at the expense of others where there are equally grave or even graver violations.”
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, addressing the Security Council on 12 December 2006, remarked “I believe the actions of some UN bodies may themselves be counterproductive. The Human Rights Council, for example, has already held three special sessions focused on the Arab-Israeli conflict. I hope the Council will take care to handle the issue in an impartial way, and not allow it to monopolize attention at the expense of other situations where there are no less grave violations, or even worse.”