Why World's Democracies Snubbed U.N. Anti-Israel Debate

Good: Democracies Snub U.N. Anti-Israel Debate

On Monday, the UN Human Rights Council held its recurring Agenda Item 7 session targeting Israel. UN rights chief Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein called for a world court ruling on Israel's 'non-compliance' with the 2009 Goldstone Report which accused the Jewish state of 'war crimes'. Then one dictatorship after another excoriated Israel. Then UN Watch executive director Hillel Neuer took the floor:"Mr. Chair, as I look around the room, I note for the record that, as Oman, Lebanon and others complained, the U.S., Canada, Australia, all European Union member states, Japan, and other established democracies have boycotted this debate.I have stayed to explain why. The democracies are absent to protest prejudice: because this is the only agenda item that singles out one specific state, the Jewish state, for differential and discriminatory treatment. Not Syria, not Sudan, not North Korea is treated this way.Democracies like the U.S. and Canada stayed away because this debate is designed to invert terrorist and victim. On Friday, next to holy sites in Jerusalem, Palestinian terrorists carried out two simultaneous stabbing and shooting attacks, killing 23 year-old Hadas Malka. Both ISIS and Hamas claimed responsibility.To his credit, U.N. envoy Nikolay Mladenov condemned Hamas for praising the attacks as ‘heroic.’ Yet why is it that the ‘State of Palestine’ just spoke and refused to condemn the murder? Why, instead, did his government condemn Israel for the deaths of the attackers, calling it a ‘war crime’? The inversion of Friday’s terrorist attack is the same inversion underlying today’s report, which seeks to follow up the 2009 Goldstone Report that accused Israel of war crimes for responding to terror attacks by Hamas – just as France, the UK and every other democracy now must respond to Jihadist terrorism. Finally, Mr. President, why is the UN still trying to implement the Goldstone Report, when its author Goldstone famously retracted its core charge?"Transcript: : www.unwatch.orgYouTube: https://youtu.be/5VV7fUDJF8A

Posted by UN Watch on Thursday, June 22, 2017

Western democracies snubbed a U.N. Human Rights Council debate targeting Israel, held on Monday, June 19th, under its permanently recurring Agenda Item 7 session on Palestine. Below are highlights from the debate.
U.N. rights chief Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein called for a world court ruling on Israel’s “non-compliance” with the 2009 Goldstone Report which accused the Jewish state of ‘war crimes’.
State of Palestine: Israel persists in ethnic cleansing, building the wall of separation, racial discrimination, destruction of homes, aggression against places of worship, including yesterday, aggression against persons praying.
Syria: The council should continue to monitor under Agenda Item 7 the grave violations of the occupying power in the occupied Syrian Golan: extrajudicial killing, arbitrary detention, forced displacement, collective punishment, siege, displacement of Syrian families.
Islamic Group (56 states represented by Pakistan):  The overall context is one of aggression and apartheid.
North Korea: Despite repeated calls and demands of the international community, israel continues to commit various forms of hr violations, including the expansion of jewish settlements and murdering innocent civilians. Persistent violations of HR and international law.
Oman: Some countries are trying to marginalize and boycott this agenda item, even though it reveals the worst violations of Palestinians’ human rights. The High Commissioner’s report reveals the impunity of Israel for its violations of international law.
UN Watch Executive Director Hillel Neuer: Mr. Chair, as I look around the room, I note for the record that, as Oman, Lebanon and others complained, the U.S., Canada, Australia, all European Union member states, Japan, and other established democracies have boycotted this debate. I have stayed to explain why.
The democracies are absent to protest prejudice: because this is the only agenda item that singles out one specific state, the Jewish state, for differential and discriminatory treatment. Not Syria, not Sudan, not North Korea is treated this way.
Democracies like the U.S. and Canada stayed away because this debate is designed to invert terrorist and victim. On Friday, next to holy sites in Jerusalem, Palestinian terrorists carried out two simultaneous stabbing and shooting attacks, killing 23 year-old Hadas Malka. Both ISIS and Hamas claimed responsibility.
To his credit, U.N. envoy Nikolay Mladenov condemned Hamas for praising the attacks as ‘heroic.’ Yet why is it that the ‘State of Palestine’ just spoke and refused to condemn the murder? Why, instead, did his government condemn Israel for the deaths of the attackers, calling it a ‘war crime’?
The inversion of Friday’s terrorist attack is the same inversion underlying today’s report, which seeks to follow up the 2009 Goldstone Report that accused Israel of war crimes for responding to terror attacks by Hamas – just as France, the UK and every other democracy now must respond to Jihadist terrorism.
Finally, Mr. President, why is the UN still trying to implement the Goldstone Report, when its author Goldstone famously retracted its core charge?

Share

Share on facebook
Share on twitter

Recent

Top Tweets October 2021

UN Watch’s Top Tweets in October 2021

Trending UN Watch tweets from October: NBA basketball star Enes Kanter speaks out against Chinese dictatorship; Nigeria jails indigenous opposition leader; Iran slams “any form of terrorism”;

UNRWA donors must hold agency to account

As governments gather today in Brussels to make pledges for UNRWA, the independent organization UN Watch issued this appeal for oversight and accountability. UN Watch

UN Watch