New Report: China, Cuba, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iraq, Malaysia deemed
“Not Qualified”; Guatemala, South Africa and Tunisia are “Questionable”
UN Watch’s Hillel Neuer, with Prof. Irwin Cotler, MPs, activists, families of political prisoners,
presents NGO report urging democracies to oppose dictators. Canadian Parliament, Oct. 5, 2016.
GENEVA, October 27, 2016 – As the UN is set to elect 14 nations tomorrow to its highest human rights body, UN Watch urged U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power and her UK, French, German and other EU allies to end their “deafening silence” on the candidacies of non-democracies, despite repeated pleas over the past month for them to speak out.
A 21-page joint NGO report was published by UN Watch, Human Rights Foundation and the Raoul Wallenberg Center for Human Rights, and circulated to UN diplomats. The report finds that China, Cuba, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iraq, Malaysia and Rwanda, are “Not Qualified” under the U.N.’s own membership criteria.
The qualifications of Guatemala, South Africa and Tunisia were deemed “questionable” based on problematic human right records or in their UN voting records.
Sadly, all signs are that the UN will disregard its own rules and principles by tomorrow electing China, Cuba, Russia, and Saudi Arabia — even though these regimes systematically violate the human rights of their own citizens and consistently frustrate UN initiatives to protect the human rights of others.
“For the UN to elect Saudi Arabia as a world judge on human rights would be like a town making a pyromaniac into chief of the fire department,” said Neuer.
UN Watch is proposing two major reforms to the election system:
- If our own democracies continue to disregard the election criteria by voting for abusers then we should just scrap elections altogether, and make every country a member, as is the case in the General Assembly’s human rights committee, and as many proposed in 2005-2006 when the council was being shaped. At least that way Saudi ambassadors around the world could no longer hold up their UNHRC election as a shield of international legitimacy to cover up the abuses of their regime.
- Second, vote trades flourish only in the darkness of the UN’s archaic secret ballot system for elections. We need to make all UN votes public; sunshine is always the best disinfectant. The UK and France may privately be voting for Saudi Arabia, but they would never dare do so publicly.
UN Watch has been leading the campaign this year with a coalition of NGOs to oppose the re-election of Saudi Arabia, Russia, China and Cuba, as well as the new election bids of Egypt, Iraq, Malaysia and Rwanda, by lobbying governments, and through online petitions, high profile parliamentary events, UN press conferences, university lectures, YouTube videos, and op-eds in the Washington Post and other major newspapers.
Regrettably neither the U.S. nor the EU has said a word about hypocritical candidacies that only undermine the credibility and effectiveness of the UN human rights system.
By turning a blind eye as human rights violators easily join and subvert the council, leading democracies will be complicit in the world body’s moral decline.
It will be an insult to their political prisoners and many other victims — and a defeat for the global cause of human rights — if the UN helps gross abusers act as champions and global judges of human rights.
When the U.N.’s highest human rights body becomes a case of the foxes guarding the henhouse, the world’s victims suffer.
Following are key campaign resources for activists and journalists:
Report on Candidates
Click here for the report, by UN Watch, Human Rights Foundation and the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights, analyzing which candidates should be rejected.
Absurd Pledges by Dictatorships
Dictatorships have published and submitted to the UN absurd claims about their human rights record, which have been analyzed and exposed by UN Watch:
- Saudi Arabia’s absurd UNHRC campaign election platform
- China’s absurd UNHRC campaign election platform
- Cuba’s absurd UNHRC campaign election platform
- Russia’s absurd UNHRC campaign election platform
- Egypt’s absurd UNHRC campaign election platform
- Iraq’s absurd UNHRC campaign election platform
Quotes by Dissidents & Activists
Click here for quotable comments on the election by leading human rights dissidents and activists.
- Expel Saudi Arabia from the UN Human Rights Council
- No to Vladimir Putin on the UN Human Rights Council
- #StopSaudi: Vote NO to Saudi Arabia on the UN Human Rights Council
- #StopRussia: Right vs. Wrong at the UN
Victim Testimonies & Press Conferences
Click here for YouTube videos featuring victim testimonies, and NGO press conferences, opposing the election of abusers to the UNHRC for 2017-2019.
Click here for the Washington Post op-ed by Yang Jianli, Chinese dissident and UN Watch board member, opposing the re-election of China.
Latest Blog Posts
Click here to see more of UN Watch’s latest blog posts on all aspects of the 2016 UNHRC elections.